Sabah Forest Industries Sdn Bhd V Industrial Court Malaysia Anor

Relating to application for leave to appeal to the federal court from.

Sabah forest industries sdn bhd v industrial court malaysia anor. Cotw130222 sabah forest industries sdn bhd v. Sri alam sdn bhd cotw130208 microsoft corporation v. Tan mooi ors v tengku mohd saad ors and other appeals 2011 2 clj 145 fc. Terengganu forest products sdn bhd v cosco container lines co ltd anor 2011 1 clj 51 fc.

Sabah forest industries sdn bhd v. Harapan permai sdn bhd v sabah forest industries sdn bhd 2011 1 clj 285 2011 2 mlj 192 ca. Alimah md som lwn. However it should also be noted that a contract is not frustrated by reason of it having become too difficult to perform or difficult to interpret pacific forest industries sdn bhd v lin wen chih 2009 6 mlj 293.

Industrial court malaysia anor civil appeal no. S 01 227 2011 2013 2 ilr 1. 9 4 893 10 2014 4 ilr 266. The court must find it practically unjust to enforce the original promise or contractual obligation.

He provided what was a seemingly compelling argument making reference to a previous practice direction and the case of sabah forest industries sdn. In sabah forest industries sdn bhd v industrial court malaysia anor 5 the court of appeal held inter alia that compensation in lieu of reinstatement does not arise in cases where the employee has passed his compulsory retirement age which is currently set at the age of 60 pursuant to section 4 of the minimum retirement age act 2012. In the court of appeal s case of sabah forest industries sdn bhd v industrial court malaysia anor 2013 2 mlj 410 procedural impropriety became a ground for judicial review when the industrial court or public decision maker failed to observe the principles of natural justice on top of failing to observe procedural rules that are expressly laid down in the statute from which it derives. S 01 1m 359 10 2013 2014 4 ilr 258.

V industrial court malaysia anor 2014 to further substantiate his view. Suresh kumar sundram v. Ketua pengarah pertubuhan keselamatan sosial no. In this case the plaintiff purchased the car from primakar and let it to the first defendant pursuant to a hire purchase agreement entered into between them with the second defendant guaranteeing repayment.

10 18 4 456 11 2014 4 ilr 275. Unhappy with the interpretation attained the matter was taken up in judicial review before the high court. Selangor properties bhd 2007 3 clj 695. Industrial court malaysia anor civil appeal no.

This is evidenced from the case of guan aik moh kl sdn bhd anor v. Products sdn bhd dan 1. Isa abu bakar anor cotw130118 serac asia sdn bhd v. Heng kuang yuan lwn.

Act integrated system sdn bhd cotw130125 rhb bank bhd v. Cosco container lines co. Judgments of datuk syed kechik bin syed mohamed anor v the board of trustees of the sabah foundation ors and another. Interworld network m sdn bhd no.

Stanson marketing sdn bhd case no. Sabah forest industries sdn bhd v. Industrial court malaysia anor cotw130215 wan khairani wan mahmood v.